Sex Differences in Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in China.

Abstract

Sex differences in stroke outcomes are crucial to secondary prevention, but previous reports showed inconsistent results. We aimed to explore the sex differences in stroke outcomes in the Third China National Stroke Registry, a prospective multicenter registry study. Among the 15 166 patients enrolled between 2015 and 2018, 9038 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were included. The primary outcomes were stroke recurrence, mortality, and unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale > 2) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Cox regression model was used for stroke recurrence and mortality and logistic regression was used for the unfavorable functional outcome, and adjusted as follows: (1) Model 1: without adjustment; (2) Model 2: adjusted for potential risk factors, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at admission, prestroke modified Rankin Scale, tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment, TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification, and onset-to-door time; (3) Model 3: adjusted for covariates from model 2 in addition to blood pressure and blood serum covariates. Multiple imputation was used for missing values, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to describe sex differences by age groups. One-third (2802/9038) of the patients were women. Women were significantly older than men (64.78±10.84 versus 61.26±11.42, P<0.001). In the fully adjusted model, female patients were more likely to have unfavorable functional outcomes at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.28 [1.09-1.50]), especially among patients aged 65 years or older (odds ratio, 1.39 [1.14-1.70]), but no difference was discovered in patients aged <65 years. There were no sex differences in stroke recurrence and mortality at 3, 6, or 12 months or unfavorable functional outcomes at 6 or 12 months after adjustment. Compared with men, women with AIS were less likely to have favorable outcomes at 3 months in China, especially among those over 65 years of age. Experts should aim to tailor secondary prevention strategies for high-risk patients.