Abstract

Although several studies support evolutionary perspectives on sex differences in romantic attachment, these sex differences in East Asia remain controversial. To estimate the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults, a meta-analysis of sex differences was conducted in the present study. This meta-analysis was based on 111 samples using the Chinese version of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale and its revised version. The findings suggest that the effect size of sex differences in romantic attachment among Chinese adults is relatively small. Overall, females demonstrated higher anxiety and avoidance than males, with substantial between-study heterogeneity. Sex differences were largest in community samples, with higher avoidance and lower anxiety in males. There were smaller sex differences in college student samples, with higher anxiety and avoidance in females. The degree of sex differences also varied across geographical regions, with high-stress and high-fertility reproductive environments showing smaller sex differences in general and larger sex differences in extreme conditions. Sex differences in anxiety increased linearly with age, whereas those in avoidance remained unchanged. The results support evolutionary perspectives of sex differences in romantic attachment, which assume that the average sex differences in romantic attachment styles should be relatively small in most populations, and many possible factors might moderate such differences. The heterogeneity and limitations of the current findings and directions for future research on sex differences in romantic attachment are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.