Abstract

We report on an experimental study that was set up to reveal differences in the tendencies of men and women to cooperate in same-sex interactions. Former studies on this subject were mostly conducted in industrialized modern societies. In contrast, we tested the cooperation tendency among Buryats, a people from Southern Siberia of Mongolian origin. All subjects participated in (1) one iterated Public Goods Game in a group of four individuals of the same sex and (2) four one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma games with different partners of the same sex. The interactions were in a face-to-face setting, but any intentional communication during the experiments was prohibited. We found that Buryat men were more cooperative than Buryat women in both types of same-sex interactions. In particular, the fraction of men employing a strategy of unconditional cooperation in the iterated Public Goods Game was much higher (36%) than the fraction of unconditional cooperators among women (21%). In general, the behavior of men was less context dependent than the behavior of women. In both sexes, individuals who were more cooperative in one type of game tended to be more cooperative in the other type of game. Although direct communication was prohibited, the interaction partners in the Prisoner’s Dilemma games employed the same strategy much more frequently than expected by chance. We conclude that, even among strangers, the exchange of subtle signals is sufficient to coordinate strategic decisions.

Highlights

  • We report on an experimental study that was set up to reveal differences in the tendencies of men and women to cooperate in same-sex interactions

  • The distribution of initial investments does not seem to differ much between men and women

  • Upon closer examination of literature, it turns out that studies considering samesex group cooperation come to contradicting conclusions; four studies report that women tend to be more cooperative in same-sex situations [2,3,4,5]; one study found men to be more cooperative [6]; and five could not detect significant sex differences [7,8,9,10,11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We report on an experimental study that was set up to reveal differences in the tendencies of men and women to cooperate in same-sex interactions. Sex differences in cooperative behavior have been experimentally studied for more than 50 years. The most extensive survey of the literature on the subject [1] reviews only 10 studies considering same-sex cooperation in the context of public goods provisioning.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.