Abstract

Vertebrate sex‐determining mechanisms (SDMs) are triggered by the genotype (GSD), by temperature (TSD), or occasionally, by both. The causes and consequences of SDM diversity remain enigmatic. Theory predicts SDM effects on species diversification, and life‐span effects on SDM evolutionary turnover. Yet, evidence is conflicting in clades with labile SDMs, such as reptiles. Here, we investigate whether SDM is associated with diversification in turtles and lizards, and whether alterative factors, such as lifespan's effect on transition rates, could explain the relative prevalence of SDMs in turtles and lizards (including and excluding snakes). We assembled a comprehensive dataset of SDM states for squamates and turtles and leveraged large phylogenies for these two groups. We found no evidence that SDMs affect turtle, squamate, or lizard diversification. However, SDM transition rates differ between groups. In lizards TSD‐to‐GSD surpass GSD‐to‐TSD transitions, explaining the predominance of GSD lizards in nature. SDM transitions are fewer in turtles and the rates are similar to each other (TSD‐to‐GSD equals GSD‐to‐TSD), which, coupled with TSD ancestry, could explain TSD's predominance in turtles. These contrasting patterns can be explained by differences in life history. Namely, our data support the notion that in general, shorter lizard lifespan renders TSD detrimental favoring GSD evolution in squamates, whereas turtle longevity permits TSD retention. Thus, based on the macro‐evolutionary evidence we uncovered, we hypothesize that turtles and lizards followed different evolutionary trajectories with respect to SDM, likely mediated by differences in lifespan. Combined, our findings revealed a complex evolutionary interplay between SDMs and life histories that warrants further research that should make use of expanded datasets on unexamined taxa to enable more conclusive analyses.

Highlights

  • Vertebrate sex determination, or the commitment to a male or female developmental fate, can be triggered by an individual’s genotype or by environmental factors such as temperature

  • We explored whether differential diversification explains the contrasting abundance of sexdetermining mechanisms (SDM) in turtles and lizards in order to illuminate the causes and consequences of SDM evolution in these two lineages

  • No significant difference between SDMs was observed under both statistical measures (P > 0.5 in all minimal number of species (MNS) values, Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vertebrate sex determination, or the commitment to a male or female developmental fate, can be triggered by an individual’s genotype (genotypic sex determination [GSD]) or by environmental factors such as temperature (temperature-dependent sex determination [TSD]; Bull 1983; Valenzuela and Lance 2004). Sex Determination, Diversification, and Life Span mammals, birds, and amphibians, while TSD exists in some fishes and in many reptiles (Bachtrog et al 2014). Fewer examples of species with mixed mechanisms where GSD systems are overridden by certain temperatures have been documented in reptiles and fish (e.g., Shine et al 2002; Yamamoto et al 2014; Holleley et al 2015). A clear explanation for the evolution of this diversity in sexdetermining mechanisms (SDM) remains elusive as our understanding of the causes and consequences of SDM turnover is inadequate

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.