Abstract
To the Editor.— While I agree with Drs de la Chapelle 1 and Simpson 2 that the sex chromatin screening method presently used by the International Olympic Committee to verify gender is problematic, alternative screening methods are inadequate for determining the sex of athletes. In response to differences in performance between the sexes, segregation of athletic contests by sex has been both a desirable and a necessary goal. 3,4 The rationale espoused by the US Olympic Committee for separation of the sexes in the majority of events is that it ensures the matching of persons of equal strength. While Drs de la Chapelle and Simpson argue that the fundamental failure of sex chromatin screening is that it assesses the least relevant parameter of sex, alternative screening methods are inferior as a determinant of sex where the participant intends to compete against others on the basis of physical ability. For example,
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
