Abstract
Ultrasound-derived blood flow velocity (BFV) levels [e.g., peak systolic velocity (PSV)], intrabeat indexes (e.g., resistive), and intersegment ratios [e.g., internal/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) PSV ratio] are assessed to describe cardiovascular physiology and health status (e.g., disease severity evaluation and/or risk stratification). In this respect, fixed cut-off values (disregard of age or sex) have been proposed to define “significant” vascular disease from BFV-derived data (parameters). However, the use of single fixed cut-off values has limitations. Accurate use of BFV-derived parameters requires knowing their physiological age-related profiles and the expected values for a specific subject. To our knowledge, there are no studies that have characterized BFV profiles in large populations taking into account: (i) data from different age-stages (as a continuous) and transitions (childhood–adolescence–adulthood), (ii) complementary parameters, (iii) data from different arteries, and (iv) potential sex- and hemibody-related differences. Furthermore, (v) there is little information regarding normative data [reference intervals (RIs)] for BFV indexes.Aims: The aims of this study are the following: (a) to determine the need for age-, body side-, and sex-specific profiles for BFV levels and derived parameters (intrabeat indexes and intersegment ratios), and (b) to define RIs for BFV levels and parameters, obtained from CCA, ICA, external carotid, vertebral, femoral, and brachial arteries records.Methods: A total of 3,619 subjects (3–90 years) were included; 1,152 were healthy (without cardiovascular disease and atheroma plaques) and non-exposed to cardiovascular risk factors. BFV data were acquired. The agreement between left and right data was analyzed (Concordance correlation, Bland–Altman). Mean and SD equations and age-related profiles were obtained for BFV levels and parameters (regression methods; fractional polynomials).Results: Left and right body-side derived data were not always equivalent. The need for sex-specific RIs was dependent on the parameter and/or age considered. RIs were defined for each studied artery and parameter. Percentile curves were compared with recommended fixed cut-off points. The equations for sex, body-side, and age-specific BFV physiological profiles obtained in the large population (of children, adolescents, and adults) studied were included (spreadsheet formats), enabling to determine for a particular subject, the expected values and potential data deviations.
Highlights
B-mode ultrasound (US) evaluation of peripheral arteries morpho-structural characteristics has been proposed as a valuable strategy to assess vascular health status and to improve risk stratification and/or disease diagnose in asymptomatic and healthy subjects
Low common carotid artery (CCA) Peak systolic velocity (PSV), and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) are independently associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and events (Chuang et al, 2011, 2016); high internal carotid artery (ICA) PSV contributes to predict and grade ICA stenosis (Tokunaga et al, 2016); and low common femoral artery (CFA) PSV is predictive of ipsilateral iliac occlusion (Shaalan et al, 2003)
Despite for some blood flow velocity (BFV) indexes there were statistical differences between right and left hemibodies data, the differences would not be significant in clinical practice
Summary
B-mode ultrasound (US) evaluation of peripheral arteries (e.g., carotid and femoral) morpho-structural characteristics (e.g., atherosclerotic plaques presence, diameters, and intima-media thickness) has been proposed as a valuable strategy to assess vascular health status and to improve risk stratification and/or disease diagnose in asymptomatic and healthy subjects. Structural assessment can be complemented by Doppler US evaluation, which allows quantifying blood flow velocity (BFV) levels and indexes that give data about micro- and macro-vascular status, and have shown to vary in association with physiological and pathological states (Hwang, 2017). Using software integrated into conventional US devices, different BFV parameters can be evaluated: (i) BFV levels [e.g., peak systolic (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV)], (ii) “intrabeat” indexes [e.g., resistive (RI), pulsate (PI)], and (iii) “intersegment” velocity ratios. These complementary parameters are clinically important to assess the functional status of the macro and microvascular systems. CCA PI, and RI are associated with the prevalence of cerebral atherosclerosis and cardiovascular
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
