Abstract

The increased incidence of injury demonstrated in epidemiological data for the elderly population, and females compared to males, has not been fully understood in the context of the biomechanical response to impact. A contributing factor to these differences in injury risk could be the variation in geometry between young and aged persons and between males and females. In this study, a new methodology, coupling a CAD and a repositioning software, was developed to reposture an existing Finite element neck while retaining a high level of mesh quality. A 5th percentile female aged neck model (F0575YO) and a 50th percentile male aged neck model (M5075YO) were developed from existing young (F0526YO and M5026YO) neck models (Global Human Body Models Consortium v5.1). The aged neck models included an increased cervical lordosis and an increase in the facet joint angles, as reported in the literature. The young and the aged models were simulated in frontal (2, 8, and 15 g) and rear (3, 7, and 10 g) impacts. The responses were compared using head and relative facet joint kinematics, and nominal intervertebral disc shear strain. In general, the aged models predicted higher tissue deformations, although the head kinematics were similar for all models. In the frontal impact, only the M5075YO model predicted hard tissue failure, attributed to the combined effect of the more anteriorly located head with age, when compared to the M5026YO, and greater neck length relative to the female models. In the rear impacts, the F0575YO model predicted higher relative facet joint shear compared to the F0526YO, and higher relative facet joint rotation and nominal intervertebral disc strain compared to the M5075YO. When comparing the male models, the relative facet joint kinematics predicted by the M5026YO and M5075YO were similar. The contrast in response between the male and female models in the rear impacts was attributed to the higher lordosis and facet angle in females compared to males. Epidemiological data reported that females were more likely to sustain Whiplash Associated Disorders in rear impacts compared to males, and that injury risk increases with age, in agreement with the findings in the present study. This study demonstrated that, although the increased lordosis and facet angle did not affect the head kinematics, changes at the tissue level were considerable (e.g., 26% higher relative facet shear in the female neck compared to the male, for rear impact) and relatable to the epidemiology. Future work will investigate tissue damage and failure through the incorporation of aged material properties and muscle activation.

Highlights

  • The elderly population has been identified to have an increased incidence of injury, compared to a young population, under similar loading in vehicular crashes (Lomoschitz et al, 2002; Kahane, 2013)

  • The facet angle of the M5075YO and F0575YO models (Figure 6) were in agreement with the literature (Parenteau et al, 2014), within one standard deviation of the average with the exception of the C5 and C6 level in the male and C4 and C6 in the female, where the models had a higher facet angle compared to the literature (Figure 6)

  • Model Response Assessed With Head Kinematics and Tissue-Level Response

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The elderly population has been identified to have an increased incidence of injury, compared to a young population, under similar loading in vehicular crashes (Lomoschitz et al, 2002; Kahane, 2013). In addition to the increased lordosis in the neck with age, the cervical spine undergoes other morphological changes, such as an increase in facet angle (Parenteau et al, 2014). It has been reported that females have a higher risk of Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) than males (Carlsson, 2012) in rear impacts. These outcomes are potentially related to the geometrical features (e.g., cervical lordosis, facet angle and size) of females, compared to males, and how they interact with the vehicle seat and safety systems (Kullgren et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call