Severe medial osteoarthritis predicts patient dissatisfaction after proximal fibular osteotomy: a mid- to long-term follow-up study.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate postoperative patient satisfaction at mid- to long-term follow-up after proximal fibular osteotomy and to identify risk factors for patient dissatisfaction. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that included 252 knees from 160 osteoarthritis (OA) patients who underwent proximal fibular osteotomy with a follow-up of four to eightyears. Patients were categorized into a satisfied group (satisfaction score ≥ 20) or a dissatisfied group (satisfaction score < 20) based on the New Knee Society Score (New KSS). Patient demographics, preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade, preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, and preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were compared between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for patient dissatisfaction. Of the 203 knees, 130 (64.0%) were satisfied with their results. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that severe medial OA (K-L grade = IV) was an independent risk factor for patient dissatisfaction after proximal fibular osteotomy (OR 8.334, 95% CI 3.815-18.206, P < 0.001). Our study confirmed that proximal fibular osteotomy was a simple and effective treatment for medial OA patients, and majority of our patients obtained a higher satisfaction rate within mid- to long-term follow-up after surgery. Severe medial OA, however, was an independent risk factor for dissatisfaction.