Abstract

Abstract The prevalence of lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation (LITR) ranges between 7 to 45%. The most frequent mechanism of LITR is the impingement of the leaflets, but right ventricle remodelling, pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and tricuspid annular dilatation also can contribute to the severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Different studies concluded that LITR was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. Beyond diuretics, patients (P) may be candidates for interventional treatment, including lead extraction, surgery, or percutaneous tricuspid trans-catheter ‘edge-to-edge’ repair (TEER) and heterotopic bicaval devices (HBD). Despite its importance, there is a scarcity of data concerning the management and clinical impact of severe LITR. The purpose of the current analysis is to improve the knowledge regarding the impact of interventional treatment on the outcomes in this population. Methods A retrospective, single-centre analysis was made including P with severe LITR referred to evaluation regarding eligibility for tricuspid percutaneous intervention in a tertiary hospital. All P were evaluated using both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Data were collected regarding clinical characterization, management, intervention and follow-up. Results From January 2020 to September 2023, of the 97 P referred for tricuspid intervention eligibility, 36 (37%) had LITR, with 14 cases (39%) presenting lead impingement as the TR mechanism. The majority of P were female (58%), with a median age of 78 [IQR 72-83] years. Median Euroscore II was 6 % [IQR 3-9]), with 51% of the P having a previous heart surgery, and 97% presenting atrial fibrillation. Prior to cardiac electronic device (CIED) implantation, 14% already presented TR. When analysing post-CIED TR, 30% increased 1 grade of TR at 1-year follow-up, and 68% increased 2 grades of TR at 5 years. According to TTE, ventricular desynchrony was present in 30% of the P. After evaluation of TR, 30% underwent intervention (22% percutaneous - TEER or HBD - and 8% surgical). All P remained with the previous electrodes. Mortality was 21.1% in the intervention population and 78.9% on the remaining pts (p=0.027). The type of intervention had no statistically significant differences in outcome. Conclusions In our study, more than 1/3 of the cases referred due to severe TR presented lead impingement as the mechanism underlying TR. As previously reported, the intervened population had better outcomes than the remaining pts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call