Abstract
A prospective study of 213 patients with severe head injury and Glasgow Coma Scores of 8 or less was conducted to identify, at 24 hours postinjury, the favorable and unfavorable clinical factors that relate to outcome one year later. According to the Glasgow Outcome Scale, 35 percent were classified Moderate Disability or Good Recovery, 13 percent were classified Severe Disability or Vegetative State, and 52 percent had died. The presence of intact brain-stem reflexes 24 hours postinjury in comatose patients with head injury is a prognostic sign for a good recovery. Favorable clinical signs include eye opening, pupillary reactivity, spontaneous eye movement, intact oculovestibular reflexes, and motor responses such as localizing. A prognosis of poor recovery is associated with nonreactive pupils, absent oculovestibular reflexes, and motor response of extension or no response at all. These negative signs, when present individually, were associated with only a 3 to 4 percent Moderate Disability or Good Recovery rate and an 85 to 91 percent mortality rate. The Glasgow Outcome Scale was also used to define recovery patterns at intervals during the first year after injury. Ninety percent of patients reached their highest outcome category by six months. The most frequent one-month outcome category for survivors was Severe Disability. By six months postinjury, 68 percent of these patients had made sufficient neurological progress to change their classification to Moderate Disability or Good Recovery. The 16 percent of patients classified at one month as in a persistently Vegetative State had a prognosis of poor outcome. Only 28 percent of these patients progressed in one year to the Severe Disability classification.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.