Abstract
Prosocial motivations and behaviors are often crucial to the success of modern organizations. Normative theories of prosocial behavior, widely accepted by social scientists and laypeople alike, assert that prosocial behavior is motivated by concerns for others’ welfare and will increase when others face greater harm. This hypothesis, however, has never been tested under conditions of severe harm. We report results from a natural experiment combining a unique dataset of millions of time-stamped prosocial behaviors with the exogenous shocks of all major hurricanes that hit the U.S. in 2015-2018, including the worst natural disaster in U.S. history. We show that severe harm actually demotivates prosocial behavior, contrary to normative theories, but consistent with an alternative theory in which people avoid helping others when the situation feels like a
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.