Abstract

Previous analytical studies show that most of Northern Italian glass has been heavily recycled and that mixing of natron and plant ash glass was occurring (Verità and Toninato 1990; Verità et al. 2002; Uboldi and Verità 2003; Andreescu-Treadgold and Henderson 2006; Silvestri and Marcante 2011). The re-use of “old Roman glass” has been interpreted as stagnation in glass trade from the primary production areas. However, the reintroduction of plant ash glass on sites such as Torcello, Nogara, and in Lombardy at the same time as it was reintroduced in the Levant, strongly indicates long-distance contacts with the Levant at least from the eighth century CE. This paper addresses the key issue of recycling by focusing on the compositional nature of glass traded and reworked in Northern Italy after the seventh century CE set in a broad Mediterranean context by analysing major, minor, and trace elements in eighty-nine glass samples (seventh to the eleventh century AD) from the glass workshop of Piazza XX Settembre, Comacchio. Five major previously proposed compositional groups of glass have been identified from Comacchio (Levantine Apollonia and Jalame types, HIMT, Foy-2, and plant ash glass). The impact of recycling and mixing practices in Comacchio glass is also discussed with the help of known recycling markers and selected ratios (major and trace elements). The mixing between Levantine, HIMT, and plant ash glass is highlighted and end-members of potential natron to natron mixing compositional groups have been identified. The compositional nature of plant ash glass from Northern Italy is discussed in light of their trace element content and production areas.

Highlights

  • From the Roman to the Early Medieval period, large tank furnaces located in Egypt (Nenna 2014) and in the Levant (Gorin-Rosen 2000; Tal et al 2004) were producing raw glassElectronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.which was cut into pieces, and at a later time traded to the numerous secondary production centres distributed throughout the Roman Empire

  • The connection between primary and secondary workshops located in early medieval Western Europe has not been fully explored because few comparable analytical data sets have been published for Western European glass dated from the seventh century CE onwards

  • One natron-based composition, was recognised the in Comacchio dataset: this composition differs from the other natron-based ones for its elevated concentrations of recycling markers (Fig. 12) and for its “blurred” values when compared with the other natron glass groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From the Roman to the Early Medieval period, large tank furnaces located in Egypt (Nenna 2014) and in the Levant (Gorin-Rosen 2000; Tal et al 2004) were producing raw glass. Which was cut into pieces, and at a later time traded to the numerous secondary production centres distributed throughout the Roman Empire. This mainly centralised system allowed glass to be distributed efficiently and to it kept the primary production centres close to where the raw materials (sand and natron) could be sourced resulting in a relative standardisation of the final composition. Recycling of “old” natron glass is most likely the result of a restriction on

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call