Seven Myths on Crowding and Peripheral Vision.

Hans Strasburger

doi:10.1177/2041669520913052

Abstract

Crowding has become a hot topic in vision research, and some fundamentals are now widely agreed upon. For the classical crowding task, one would likely agree with the following statements. (1) Bouma’s law can be stated, succinctly and unequivocally, as saying that critical distance for crowding is about half the target’s eccentricity. (2) Crowding is predominantly a peripheral phenomenon. (3) Peripheral vision extends to at most 90° eccentricity. (4) Resolution threshold (the minimal angle of resolution) increases strongly and linearly with eccentricity. Crowding increases at an even steeper rate. (5) Crowding is asymmetric as Bouma has shown. For that inner-outer asymmetry, the peripheral flanker has more effect. (6) Critical crowding distance corresponds to a constant cortical distance in primary visual areas like V1. (7) Except for Bouma’s seminal article in 1970, crowding research mostly became prominent starting in the 2000s. I propose the answer is “not really” or “not quite” to these assertions. So should we care? I think we should, before we write the textbook chapters for the next generation.

Highlights

Crowding has become a hot topic in vision research, and some fundamentals are widely agreed upon
(6) Critical crowding distance corresponds to a constant cortical distance in primary visual areas like V1
(7) Except for Bouma’s seminal article in 1970, crowding research mostly became prominent starting in the 2000s

Summary

Introduction

Crowding has become a hot topic in vision research, and some fundamentals are widely agreed upon. (1) Bouma’s law can be stated, succinctly and unequivocally, as saying that critical distance for crowding is about half the target’s eccentricity. Where d is critical distance—the minimum distance between target and flanker below which crowding occurs—and u is eccentricity in degrees visual angle.

Results

Conclusion