Abstract

The purpose of this article is to understand how the blurry nature of hybrid warfare and hybrid peace influences the assessment of national security and the making of adequate foreign and security policy decisions, including, in particular, the prediction of the further course and resolution of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, which is not only a threat to Ukraine’s existence but also to European security in general. In order to properly study this issue, the Russo-Ukrainian war on the Donbas was selected as an object. As the main method of the research of this problem was chosen the conflict analysis. The conclusions drawn from this analysis prompt us to differentiate the concepts of war, peace, and conflict and bring our perceptions of them to reality. When the idea of internal conflict replaces the real war, their sophisticated substitution will leave the problem of settlement of the conflict on the Donbas not solved, and the war between Ukraine and Russia is not completed.
 Achieving peace by “settlement the conflict on the Donbas” within the framework of a real war of Russia against Ukraine will not lead to its end and sustainable peace. In such a situation, only a temporary “cold peace” is possible. The implementation of the strategy of Ukraine and the international community should begin with the rejection of the “plot for settlement the internal conflict on the Donbas” and the recognition of the reality of the war, in which the belligerent and aggressor is Russia, but not Phantoms DPR/LPR.
 The study’s objectives are based on identifying epistemological reasons that make it impossible to resolve the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas and clarify their national and international security consequences. The study results are based on an analysis of the course of the Russian-Ukrainian war and the process of settling the conflict in Donbas. The article analyzes the mechanism of interaction between hybrid war and hybrid peace in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas, clarifies the essence of war and peace under existing realities, and identifies epistemological reasons that make it impossible to resolve the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas. The article also analyses the real and probable national and international consequences of the unresolved problem of war and peace in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on Donbas.
 The article concludes with a proposal for a possible solution to war and peace on Donbas. Recommendations for resolving the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas are based on Ukraine and the international community’s rejection of the “plot for settlement the internal conflict in Donbas” and recognition of the reality of a war in which the warring party and the aggressor are Russia, but not the phantom DNR/LNR. According to these recommendations, military force should become the main instrument for coercion of Russia for forcing peace and ending the war on acceptable terms for Ukraine. Ukrainian diplomacy must act under the task of war, but not only so much for the sake of “settlement internal conflict on the Donbas.”

Highlights

  • The relevance of the research topic is determined by the search for ways to resolve the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas

  • With the transformation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict into a long-term armed confrontation, the international community is trying to forget about this clear threat to the existence of Ukraine as an independent state and to the entire architecture of European security

  • The tasks of the research are clarifying the essence of the problem of war and peace under the realities of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas; identification of the mechanism of interaction between hybrid war and hybrid peace in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict on Donbas; identification of epistemological reasons that make it impossible to settle the Russian-Ukrainian conflict in Donbas; forecasting national and in

Read more

Summary

Hybrid war as a trend of the XXI century

Regarding the name of these terms’ “hybridity” of war and peace and their novelty, the scientific community, in their lively discussions, divided into two opposite camps. In this form of war, Ukraine and Russia refuse to recognize themselves in a state of war and to rely on international law, which regulates relations between belligerent states on the legal consequences of war, such as the Hague Conventions and Declarations of 1899 and 1907, which define general principles and specific rules of international law relating to war, as well as the Geneva Conventions for the protection of war victims in 1949, and others Such a chaotic process of hybrid warfare erases its boundaries and makes invisible the onset of peace, which is commonly called “hybrid peace.”

Hybrid peace in Ukraine
Virtual peace or real war on Donbas and their consequences
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call