Abstract

This study aims to determine the settlement of criminal defamation cases through the electronic media of the Ternate City Police and to find out the considerations of the District Court Judges of Ternate in examining and deciding criminal defamation cases. The research method used is empirical normative with a descriptive research type. Sources of data consist of primary data, namely the results of interviews, and secondary data, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary legal data. Methods of data collection with literature study and interviews and then analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that the settlement of criminal defamation cases through electronic media at the District Police of Ternate in two ways, namely through penal means (repressive activities after the occurrence of a crime) and non-penal means, in the form of counseling for preventive action. The basis for consideration of the district court judges of Ternate in examining and deciding criminal defamation cases is based on formal considerations and material considerations. Based on the facts revealed at the trial, namely the fact that the defendant was found guilty of violating Article 27 paragraph 3 concerning the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE), and the act of defamation fulfilled the elements of Article 310 of the criminal code.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.