Settlement at transition zones in railway tracks – is modelling the soil as a 2-D continuum important?

Abstract

Abstract While most recent models of railway tracks include the nonlocal nature of the foundation reaction force, few studies have investigated the influence of its nonlocal nature on the response. Accounting for the nonlocal nature of the foundation force is computationally expensive and increases the complexity of the model, thus, knowing when and when not to account for it is important. This paper aims to shed light on the influence of the nonlocal, both in time and space, reaction force provided by the foundation on the transient response at railway transition zones. To this end, a 2-D system in which the soil layer is modelled as a visco-elastic continuum is compared to an equivalent 1-D system with a local foundation reaction force (i.e., Winkler foundation). Results show that, in general, the response of the 2-D system with shallow and/or stiff soil layers can be well captured by the equivalent 1-D model. However, for medium-to-deep and/or soft soil layers, the nonlocality of the foundation reaction force is influential and the transient response at transition zones cannot be satisfactorily captured by 1-D models. Finally, the ballast settlement is also poorly captured for medium-to-deep and/or soft soil layers, with the main cause being the inability of the 1-D model to separate between ballast and soil stresses, and not the locality of the reaction force.