Abstract
We propose that when the intergroup context changes, the frame of reference for social comparison, the referential meaning of an identity, as well as the definition of group membership may also change. To test this proposal, we manipulated Hong Kong college students (N = 94 ) frame of reference for social comparison by having them read a narrative account of the Diaoyu Islands sovereignty dispute and then write an essay on the responsibility of either the Beijing government ( Beijing condition) or the Japanese government ( Japan condition). Next, participants social identities and their intergroup attitude toward Mainland Chinese and Hongkongers were assessed. As predicted, in the Beijing condition, a Chinese vs Hongkonger identity was related to the preference for assimilation into the Chinese Mainlanders group, whereas social identity was unrelated to such preference in the Japan condition. The results implications for social identification processes during the political transition in Hong Kong were discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.