Abstract

Worldwide river systems are under pressure from human development. River managers need to identify the most important stressors in a stream basin, to propose effective management interventions for river restoration. In the European Union, the Water Framework Directive proposes the ecological status as the management endpoint for these interventions. Many decision support tools exist that use predictive water quality models to evaluate different river management scenarios, but only a few consider a river’s ecological status in this analysis explicitly. This paper presents a novel method, which combines abiotic monitoring data and biological monitoring data, to provide information and insight on why the ecological status does not reach the good status. We use habitat suitability models as a decision support tool, which can identify the most important stressors in river systems to define management scenarios. To this end, we disassemble the ecological status into its individual building blocks, i.e., the community composition, and we use habitat suitability models to perform an ecological gap analysis. In this paper, we present our method and its underlying ecological concepts, and we illustrate its benefits by applying the method on a regional level for Flanders using a biotic index, the Multimetric Macroinvertebrate Index Flanders (MMIF). To evaluate our method, we calculated the number of correctly classified instances (CCI = 47.7%) and the root-mean-square error (RMSE = 0.18) on the MMIF class and the MMIF value. Furthermore, there is a monotonic decreasing relationship between the results of the priority classification and the ecological status expressed by the MMIF, which is strengthened by the inclusion of ecological concepts in our method (Pearson’s R2 −0.92 vs. −0.87). In addition, the results of our method are complementary to information derived from the legal targets set for abiotic variables. Thus, our proposed method can further optimize the inclusion of monitoring data for the sake of sustainable decisions in river management.

Highlights

  • Worldwide river systems are under pressure from human development [1]

  • We aimed to combine suitability models with information on the ecological status to classify aspects of a river system as potential stressors according to their need for management

  • We showed that disassembling the ecological status into its individual building blocks has great potential to integrate the ecological status from a systems perspective into models supporting the Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation and integrated water management in general

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Worldwide river systems are under pressure from human development [1]. Pollution from agriculture, households or industry changes water quality, and urban development or navigation often require hydromorphological alterations [2]. Elosegi et al [5] argue that river managers should perform a differential diagnosis, as a doctor would diagnose a patient This means that they should monitor individual quality elements and compare them to their legal targets, but they should interpret these results using a systems perspective [6]. The legal target for dissolved oxygen concentration in river ecosystems can be interpreted as a minimal allowable lower limit. Voulvoulis et al [6] argue that river management should not focus on regulating individual monitored pollutants and hydromorphological changes, but that individual aspects of river system should be regulated from a systems perspective

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call