Abstract

Tiger numbers have collapsed so dramatically that conservationists are adopting a strategy of securing populations in priority conservation landscapes. This includes improving management effectiveness in these sites. The Conservation Assured|Tiger Standards (CA|TS) are designed to help ensure effectiveness and provide a benchmark against which to measure progress. CA|TS is a distillation of best practice and a roadmap to management effectiveness, linking management to expert-driven standards covering all aspects of management, including those which are tiger-specific (monitoring, maintenance of prey, control of poaching). Sites are audited against a set of standards and if met, are accredited as CA|TS Approved. We describe CA|TS in the context of tiger conservation, describe the evolution and philosophy of the system and consider its application across the tiger range, before drawing on lessons learned from 5 years of development. Important benefits include the independence of CA|TS from existing governmental or NGO institutions, the emphasis on regional governance and the existence of active support groups. Conversely, the participatory approach has slowed implementation. CA|TS remains more attractive to well managed sites than to sites that are struggling, although building capacity in the latter is its key aim. The close connections between people working on tiger conservation make some aspects of independent assessment challenging. Finally, if CA|TS is to succeed in its long term aims, it needs to go hand in hand with secure and adequate funding to increase management capacity in many tiger conservation areas.

Highlights

  • Global tiger (Panthera tigris) population size has fallen by over 95% since the turn of the 20th century—down from perhaps 100,000 to roughly 3900 individuals (Wolf and Ripple, 2017) [1].tigers have lost over 93% of their historic range (Walston et al, 2010) [2]

  • We examine how these differ from existing management effectiveness evaluation (MEE) processes, the development and application of CA|TS, application to date, lessons learned, and the scope for widening the approach

  • CA|TS has been used for assessing the readiness of tiger reintroduction in Cambodia (Gray, et al, 2017) [23]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tigers have lost over 93% of their historic range (Walston et al, 2010) [2]. There are only 13 recognised Tiger Range Countries Many other countries that formerly held tigers, such as South Korea and Kazakhstan, have lost their populations altogether. In response to a serious threat of extinction of wild tigers, in 2010 the conservation community committed to doubling the global wild tiger population by 2022 (known as TX2) at a major ‘tiger summit’ in St. Petersburg (Global Tiger Initiative, 2010) [6]. Petersburg (Global Tiger Initiative, 2010) [6] This global goal was supported by all 13

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call