Service Delivery Rules and the Distribution of Local Government Services: Three Detroit Bureaucracies

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesService Delivery Rules and the Distribution of Local Government Services: Three Detroit BureaucraciesBryan D. Jones, Saadia R. Greenberg, Clifford Kaufman, and Joseph DrewBryan D. Jones Search for more articles by this author , Saadia R. Greenberg Search for more articles by this author , Clifford Kaufman Search for more articles by this author , and Joseph Drew Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 40, Number 2May, 1978 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2130091 Views: 46Total views on this site Citations: 27Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1978 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Corey Kewei Xu, Tian Tang Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide: The Impacts of Technology‐Enabled Coproduction on Equity in Public Service Delivery, Public Administration Review 80, no.66 (Sep 2020): 962–975.https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13222 황소하 Effects of General Intergovernmental Grants on Fiscal Equalization and Fiscal Capacity Reversal, Journal of Budget and Policy 6, no.22 (Nov 2017): 83–118.https://doi.org/10.35525/nabo.2017.6.2.004 김흥주, In Ho Kang A Study on the Effects of Regional Fiscal Equity in the Special Grants for Regional Development: Focused on Municipality by City(si) and County(gun), Korean Public Management Review 31, no.22 (Jun 2017): 45–80.https://doi.org/10.24210/kapm.2017.31.2.003 김흥주, In Ho Kang The Effect of Tax Reduction and Exemption on Local Financial Equality: Focused on Municipalities by City(si) and County(gun), The Korean Governance Review 23, no.33 (Dec 2016): 353–382.https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2016.23.3.014Michael Javen Fortner Straight, No Chaser, Urban Affairs Review 52, no.44 (Oct 2015): 591–621.https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415608007Dorothy M. Daley, Megan Mullin, Meghan E. Rubado State Agency Discretion in a Delegated Federal Program: Evidence from Drinking Water Investment, Publius: The Journal of Federalism 44, no.44 (Aug 2013): 564–586.https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjt033Kirstin Wells, Jean-Claude Thill Do Transit-Dependent Neighborhoods Receive Inferior Bus Access? A Neighborhood Analysis in Four U.S. Cities, Journal of Urban Affairs 34, no.11 (Nov 2016): 43–63.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00575.xDale E. Thomson Strategic Geographic Targeting in Community Development: Examining the Congruence of Political, Institutional, and Technical Factors, Urban Affairs Review 47, no.44 (Mar 2011): 564–594.https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411400021J. B. Wenger, V. M. Wilkins At the Discretion of Rogue Agents: How Automation Improves Women's Outcomes in Unemployment Insurance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19, no.22 (Feb 2008): 313–333.https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum044Valentina A. Bali Implementing Popular Initiatives: What Matters for Compliance?, The Journal of Politics 65, no.44 (Jul 2015): 1130–1146.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00129Heinz Eulau, Susan Zlomke HAROLD D. LASSWELL'S LEGACY TO MAINSTREAM POLITICAL SCIENCE: A Neglected Agenda, Annual Review of Political Science 2, no.11 (Jun 1999): 75–89.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.75Seung Jong Lee Policy Type, Bureaucracy, and Urban Policies: Integrating Models of Urban Service Distribution, Policy Studies Journal 22, no.11 (Mar 1994): 87–108.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb02182.xRuth Hoogland DeHoog, David Lowery, William E. Lyons Metropolitan Fragmentation and Suburban Ghettos: Some Empirical Observations on Institutional Racism, Journal of Urban Affairs 13, no.44 (Dec 2016): 479–493.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.1991.tb00268.x Gerard S. Gryski The Influence of Committee Position on Federal Program Spending, Polity 23, no.33 (Nov 2016): 443–459.https://doi.org/10.2307/3235135 Ruth Hoogland DeHoog , David Lowery , and William E. Lyons Citizen Satisfaction with Local Governance: A Test of Individual, Jurisdictional, and City-Specific Explanations, The Journal of Politics 52, no.33 (Oct 2015): 807–837.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131828K. R. Mladenka The Distribution of an Urban Public Service: The Changing Role of Race and Politics, Urban Affairs Review 24, no.44 (Jun 1989): 556–583.https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168902400405Kenneth K. Wong POLICY-MAKING IN THE AMERICAN STATES: TYPOLOGY, PROCESS, AND INSTITUTIONS, Review of Policy Research 8, no.33 (Mar 1989): 527–548.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1989.tb00978.xJohn Clayton Thomas The Personal Side of Street-Level Bureaucracy, Urban Affairs Quarterly 22, no.11 (Aug 2016): 84–100.https://doi.org/10.1177/004208168602200105 William C. Baer Just What Is an Urban Service, Anyway?, The Journal of Politics 47, no.33 (Oct 2015): 881–898.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131215Joseph Drew THE DYNAMICS OF HUMAN SERVICES SUBCONTRACTING: SERVICE DELIVERY IN CHICAGO, DETROIT, AND PHILADELPHIA, Policy Studies Journal 13, no.11 (Sep 1984): 67–89.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1984.tb01699.x Evelyn Brodkin , and Michael Lipsky Quality Control in AFDC as an Administrative Strategy, Social Service Review 57, no.11 (Oct 2015): 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1086/644069 Fredric N. Bolotin , and David L. Cingranelli Equity and Urban Policy: The Underclass Hypothesis Revisited, The Journal of Politics 45, no.11 (Oct 2015): 209–219.https://doi.org/10.2307/2130332Bryan D. Jones Party and Bureaucracy: The Influence of Intermediary Groups on Urban Public Service Delivery, American Political Science Review 75, no.33 (Aug 2014): 688–700.https://doi.org/10.2307/1960961Mary Bryna Sanger ARE ACADEMIC MODELS OF URBAN SERVICE DISTRIBUTIONS RELEVANT TO PUBLIC POLICY?: LESSONS FROM NEW YORK, Policy Studies Journal 9, no.77 (Jun 1981): 1011–1020.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01209.xMichael Brintnall Caseloads, Performance, and Street-Level Bureaucracy, Urban Affairs Quarterly 16, no.33 (Aug 2016): 281–298.https://doi.org/10.1177/107808748101600302Kenneth R. Mladenka The Urban Bureaucracy and the Chicago Political Machine: Who Gets What and the Limits to Political Control, American Political Science Review 74, no.44 (Aug 2014): 991–998.https://doi.org/10.2307/1954318Mitchell F. Rice, Woodrow Jones Municipal Service Suits, Local Public Services and Service Equality, Midwest Review of Public Administration 14, no.11 (Sep 2016): 29–39.https://doi.org/10.1177/027507408001400103