Serum Levels of MicroRNA miR-371a-3p: A Sensitive and Specific New Biomarker for Germ Cell Tumours

Abstract

BackgroundClinical management of germ cell tumours (GCTs) relies on monitoring of serum tumour markers. However, the markers α-fetoprotein (AFP), the β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are expressed in <60% of GCT cases. ObjectiveTo test the utility of the microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-371a-3p, miR-372-3p, miR-373-3p, and miR-367-3p as sensitive and specific GCT serum biomarkers. Design, setting, and participantsSerum levels of miRNAs were measured in 166 consecutive patients with GCT before and after treatment and in 106 male controls. In the first 50 consecutive patients, all four miRNAs were measured. In the main study, only the most sensitive miRNA was further analysed. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe specificity and sensitivity of the four miRNAs were studied using receiver operating characteristic curves. miRNA sensitivities were compared to those of classical markers. Statistical cross-comparisons of miRNA levels for GCT subgroups and controls were performed at various time points during treatment. Results and limitationsOverall, miR-371a-3p performed best, with 88.7% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.5–93.3%) and 93.4% specificity (95% CI 86.9–97.3%) and an area under the curve of 0.94, outperforming AFP, bHCG, and LDH (combined sensitivity 50%). According to Kernel density estimation, the sensitivity and specificity were 86.3% and 92.5%, respectively. miR-371a-3p levels dropped to normal after completion of treatment. The miRNA levels correlated with treatment failure and relapse. Teratoma did not express miR-371a-3p. ConclusionsThe miRNA miR-371a-3p is a specific and sensitive novel serum GCT biomarker that accurately correlates with disease activity. Validation of this test in a large-scale prospective study is needed. Patient summarymiR-371a-3p is a novel serum marker for germ cell tumours that is expressed by 88.7% of patients and thus is far more sensitive and specific than classical serum markers. It correlates with tumour burden and treatment results. Validation in a large patient cohort is needed.