Abstract

Several methods can be used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection. Invasive methods include detection of the bacterium in gastric biopsy specimens by culture, immunohistochemistry, rapid urease tests, or the polymerase chain reaction. Noninvasive or less invasive detection methods include the urea breath test and serological methods. The urea breath test is based on the detection of 13CO2 or 14CO2 in breath, produced by bacterial urease in the stomach after labelled urea is swallowed. Serological methods are based on the detection of Helicobacter pylori-specific antibodies in serum, saliva, or urine. In this review, the performance and diagnostic value of several serological methods, such as enzyme immunoassay, rapid office-based assays, and Western blot, will be discussed in relation to biopsy-based methods and the urea breath test. In addition, the value of serological assays for monitoring eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection following treatment will be discussed. The diagnostic performance of properly evaluated serological assays is comparable to that of biopsy-based methods and the urea breath test. To monitor eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection following therapy, quantitative enzyme immunoassays can be used, especially in patients with high pretreatment antibody titres.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.