Abstract
BackgroundChagas disease (CD) is a systemic parasitic infection caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, whose chronic phase may lead to cardiac and intestinal disorders. Endemic in Latin America where it is transmitted mainly by vectors, large-scale migrations to other countries have turned CD into a global health problem because of its alternative transmission routes through blood transfusion, tissue transplantation, or congenital. Aim of this study was to compare the performance of two commercially available tests for serological diagnosis of CD in a group of Latin American migrants living in a non-endemic setting (Rome, Italy). The study was based on a cross-sectional analysis of seroprevalence in this group. Epidemiological risk factors associated to CD were also evaluated in this study population.MethodsThe present study was conducted on 368 subjects from the Latin American community resident in Rome. Following WHO guidelines, we employed a diagnostic strategy based on two tests to detect IgG antibodies against T. cruzi in the blood (a lysate antigen-based ELISA and a chemiluminescent microparticle CMIA composed of multiple recombinant antigens), followed by a third test (an immunochromatographic assay) on discordant samples.ResultsOur diagnostic approach produced 319/368 (86.7%) concordant negative and 30/368 (8.1%) concordant positive results after the first screening. Discrepancies were obtained for 19/368 (5.2%) samples that were tested using the third assay, obtaining 2 more positive and 17 negative results. The final count of positive samples was 32/368 (8.7% of the tested population). Increasing age, birth in Bolivia, and previous residence in a mud house were independent factors associated with T. cruzi positive serology.ConclusionsSerological diagnosis of CD is still challenging, because of the lack of a reference standard serological assay for diagnosis. Our results reaffirm the importance of performing CD screening in non-endemic countries; employing a fully automated and highly sensitive CMIA assay first could be a cost- and resource-effective strategy for mass screening of low-risk patients. However, our results also suggest that the WHO strategy of using two different serological assays, combined with epidemiological information, remains the best approach for patients coming from endemic countries.
Highlights
Chagas disease (CD) is a systemic parasitic infection caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, whose chronic phase may lead to cardiac and intestinal disorders
In both endemic and non-endemic countries, transmission of T. cruzi may occur through blood transfusion, tissue transplantation, or congenitally from mother to infant [1, 2]; these alternative infection routes are likely to occur in non-endemic settings and have turned CD into a global health problem [5, 8]
Because of the lack of a single reference standard test, the possibility of cross-reactivity, and the biological diversity and genetic polymorphism of T. cruzi, which is due to the existence of six discrete typing units (DTUs) of the parasite in different geographical areas [10], the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that a diagnosis of chronic CD be based on two positive results obtained using two different methods: a conventional test followed by a non-conventional assay [9]
Summary
Chagas disease (CD) is a systemic parasitic infection caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, whose chronic phase may lead to cardiac and intestinal disorders. Historically confined to the Americas, especially rural areas of Latin America where poor housing conditions have promoted contact with infected vectors, migrations from endemic countries have led in recent years to the appearance of the disease in other parts of the world [4,5,6,7] In both endemic and non-endemic countries, transmission of T. cruzi may occur through blood transfusion, tissue transplantation, or congenitally from mother to infant [1, 2]; these alternative infection routes are likely to occur in non-endemic settings and have turned CD into a global health problem [5, 8]. Serological diagnosis remains a challenge and screening schemes have been implemented only recently, mainly for blood and organ donors, pregnant women, and newborns [11,12,13], in an effort to control the transmission of CD [14]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have