Abstract

Brucellosis, one of the most common zoonotic diseases and has significant public health and economic importance worldwide. Few studies and reports have been performed to estimate the true prevalence of animal brucellosis in the Sultanate of Oman; however, no incidence of the disease was previously reported in Al Jabal Al Akhdar. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of brucellosis in goats in eight villages in Al Jebal Al Akhdar, Sultanate of Oman, namely: Al Aqaieb, Al Helailat, Al Ghilayil, Hail Al Hedap, Da'an Al Hamra, Shnoot, Al Qasha'e and Al Sarah, Al Jabal Al Akhdar in the Sultanate of Oman. In this study we used different diagnostic serological tests, namely, RBT, I‐ELISA and CFT to study the prevalence of Brucella infection in goats in Al Jabal Al Akhdar. Statistical analysis using Kappa statistics was used to compare the performance of the serological tests. Biochemical tests and species‐specific Multiplex PCR were used to identify the brucella species involved in the infection. A structured questionnaire and Chi‐square (x2) statistical analysis was used to identify related brucellosis risk factors. This study is the first to reveal brucellosis infection in goats in eight villages in Al Jebal Al Akhdar, Sultanate of Oman, namely: Al Aqaieb, Al Helailat, Al Ghilayil, Hail Al Hedap, Da'an Al Hamra, Shnoot, Al Qasha'e and Al Sarah, with an overall seroprevalence of 11.1%. The study also compared the performance of three different serological tests, namely, RBT, I‐ELISA and CFT. Statistical analysis using Kappa statistics showed that the degree of agreement was best seen between RBT and CFT (96%), followed by RBT, I‐ ELISA (91.4%) and CFT and I‐ ELISA (89.2%). Biochemical tests and species‐specific Multiplex PCR showed the typical profile for B. melitensis. A structured questionnaire and Chi‐square (x2) statistical analysis indicated that the presence of abortion is the major risk factor for the prevalence of brucellosis, whereas age and sex were not significant factors in the tested animals. Besides, poor knowledge about brucellosis, consumption of unpasteurized milk or milk products, free trade of animals and the introduction of new animal breeds to herds were all contributing risk factors to the prevalence of brucellosis. The prevalence of human brucellosis obtained verbally from pastoralists gave an insight that brucellosis could pose a public health hazard, especially in those high‐risk groups, mainly the pastoralists in the study area. Because of their constant and increasing interaction with their animals, pastoralists could be at a high risk of occupational infection.

Highlights

  • Brucellosis, one of the most common zoonotic diseases, has significant public health and economic importance worldwide (Corbel 1997; Almuneef et al 2004)

  • From the results obtained (Table 2), complement fixation test (CFT) test showed the lowest percentage of seropositivity with 8.3% (27/324) compared to Rose Bengal test (RBT) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA)

  • The overall seroprevalence of Brucella infection in goats was determined based on an animal being positive in RBT, iELISA and/or CFT, which resulted in an overall seroprevalence of 11.1%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brucellosis, one of the most common zoonotic diseases, has significant public health and economic importance worldwide (Corbel 1997; Almuneef et al 2004). The disease aetiology involves bacteria of the genus Brucella, which are Gram-negative, non-motile, facultative anaerobic intracellular. A wide range of mammals are targets for brucellosis, including man, cattle, sheep, goats, camels, swine and wild life (Cutler et al 2005). The genus Brucella comprises a number of species based on pathogenicity and host preference. These include B. abortus (cattle), B. canis (dogs), B. ovis (sheep), B. melitensis (sheep and goats), B. suis (pigs, reindeer and hares) and B. neotomae (desert wood rats). Brucellosis is widely distributed in Africa, Latin America, Mediterranean, Middle East and parts of Asia that represent the endemic areas for the disease (Corbel 2006)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call