Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for Helicobacter pylori was studied in 145 consecutive outpatients aged 45 years or less referred for gastroscopy. Helicobacter pylori infection can be detected by serological tests, including rapid whole-blood tests. The low prevalence of the disease in young people may have a negative effect on the positive predictive value of a test. In this study, the presence of Helicobacter pylori was assessed by a biopsy urease test and histological examination, and by several serological tests: a rapid whole-blood test on fingerstick blood, a latex agglutination serum test, a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test, and an in-house EIA for detection of antibodies of both the IgG and IgA classes. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed with invasive tests in 21 (14.5%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the EIA-based tests, compared to histological examination, were 100%, 96-97%, 81-84%, and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value of the latex agglutination test was 78%, whereas it was only 47% for the whole-blood rapid test used. Although the results of the whole-blood rapid test were unsatisfactory, the quantitative EIA-based tests could reliably detect Helicobacter pylori among young patients, in whom the prevalence of the infection is low.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call