Abstract

Serial correlation in water quality time series invalidates tests of significance, such as seasonal Kendall analysis, that assume independence. One approach to analyzing such data is to estimate the magnitude of the serial correlation and then use the degree of serial correlation to adjust the variance and make valid inferences. Four methods for estimating serial correlation lag parameters are evaluated. R‐estimation outperformed the alternative methods considered. In case studies of water quality time series, the nonparametric rank von Neumann's ratio test of randomness is used to test for the presence of serial correlation, and R‐estimation is used to estimate the severity of the serial correlation. Case study results demonstrate that serial correlation is common in monthly water quality data and does not disappear when bimonthly intervals are used. Adjustment for flow and seasonal effects generally reduced estimates of serial correlation. However, even after flow adjustment and deseasonalization, the assumption of independence was often unreasonable.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.