Abstract

To determine the diagnostic utility of serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examinations for hematological malignancy causing neurological disease. All CSF cytology reports at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2005 to 2014 (n=20,018) were reviewed. Study inclusion criteria were: repeated CSF examinations within 1year in patients without known hematological malignancy performed to determine if hematological malignancy was the cause of neurological disease. Exclusion criteria were: preexisting hematological malignancy; >1year between CSF examinations, serial CSF examinations for infection, tumor surveillance or intrathecal therapies, and for assessment or treatment of CSF dynamics (e.g. idiopathic intracranial hypertension, CSF shunt or persistent CSF leak). The initial study population included patients undergoing three or more serial CSF examinations; subsequently those undergoing two serial CSF examinations were investigated. A total of 613 patients met the study criteria with 477 having two CSF examinations and 136 having three or greater CSF examinations. Of those with three or greater serial CSF examinations none were found to have hematological malignancy exclusively on the third or subsequent CSF examinations. Of those with two CSF examinations 0.4% (2/477) were found to have hematological malignancy (large B cell lymphomas) exclusively on the second CSF. Ten patients (1.6%) had suspicious hematological abnormalities on initial CSF examinations confirmed on subsequent CSF examinations. Serial CSF examinations are of low yield to diagnose hematological malignancy as a cause of neurological disease but may confirm atypical features observed in an initial CSF examination.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.