Abstract
This article compares Soviet factography (“Literature of Fact”) and logical positivism, arguing that Soviet worker-correspondents’ struggle with the deformation of the facts of socialist life within literature is to be understood as a literary positivism, akin to logical positivism’s struggle with incorrect language use and the metaphysical questions arising. In the late 1920s, factography’s leader Sergei Tret’iakov arrived at a pragmatic turn in his practice of “operative factography”, similar to what occurred later in philosophy of language. Analyzing this self-reflexive and self-critical literary practice from the perspectives of narratology and post-formalist micro-sociology, it is proposed that estrangement (“ostranenie”) is intrinsic to the very act of utterance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.