Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine if sequential interventional therapy can become a mainstay option in providing palliation from fastidious osseous neoplasms in patients with pain refractory to oral analgesia and radiotherapy. This retrospective monocentric study was approved by our institutional review board. Between July 2012 and August 2014, we reviewed 15 patients (6 women, 9 men; age range of 36-81 years) who underwent embolization followed by cryoablation, with or without osteoplasty. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics, including primary histology and the location of metastasis, were included in our review. Pain intensity at baseline, after radiotherapy, and after sequential interventional therapy was reviewed using the hospital electronic medical record. The use of oral analgesia and procedural complications was also noted. Data was then assessed for normality and a two-tailed Student's t-test was performed on mean pain scores for difference phases of treatment. While radiotherapy offers pain relief with a mean pain score of 7.25 ±1.5 (p =<.0001), sequential interventional therapy results in better comfort as demonstrated by a mean pain score of 3.9 ± 2.6 (p=.0015). Moreover, all patients who reported oral analgesic use at presentation reported a decrease in their requirement after sequential interventional therapy. Embolization and cryoablation were performed in all patients, while osteoplasty was indicated in 6 cases. There was no difference in postprocedural pain intensity between patients who required osteoplasty and patients who did not (p = 0.7514). There were no complications observed during treatment. This retrospective study shows that sequential intervention with transarterial embolization, cryoablation, and osteoplasty is both safe and efficacious for bone pain refractory to the current standard of care. We demonstrated that this combination therapy has the potential to become an effective mainstay treatment paradigm in the palliative care of osseous neoplasm to improve quality of life.

Highlights

  • Both primary malignant and metastatic osseous neoplasms are a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality [1]

  • Multicenter studies have demonstrated that radiofrequency (RF) ablation is efficacious for pain relief in patients with osseous metastases [5]

  • Cryoablation allows for greater control of the ablation margin because a low-attenuation ice ball is identifiable on computed tomography (CT) monitoring

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Both primary malignant and metastatic osseous neoplasms are a significant cause of cancer morbidity and mortality [1]. Metastases are associated with fracture, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia, with pain as the cardinal symptom affecting up to 80% of patients [2]. Both primary and metastatic osseous neoplasms can Characteristic No of patients (female/male) n=15 Mean age, y (+/- SD) Range Previous RT Oral analgesics at presentation Tumor type histology (n=15). Cryoablation allows for greater control of the ablation margin because a low-attenuation ice ball is identifiable on computed tomography (CT) monitoring This allows cryoablation to be performed in close proximity to critical structures, as observed with spinal metastases. We hypothesize that a treatment paradigm of sequential therapy (ST) with arterial embolization, cryoablation, and osteoplasty will demonstrate significant improvement in pain and improved quality of life with minimal complications

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call