Abstract
When the conventional method of defining sequential element timing parameters is used in conjunction with the conventional method of accounting for clock uncertainty in timing analysis, the results are overly pessimistic because, when clock uncertainty is nonzero, the element can never be simultaneously critical for both setup time and clock-to- $Q$ . This brief shows that the actual sequencing overhead of conventional flip-flops is 0.5–1 fanout-of-4 (FO4) inverter delay shorter than conventional models predict. High-performance flip-flops, with a modest transparency window, can be 2 FO4 delays faster. While the exact overhead becomes a function of the clock uncertainty, for typical uncertainties, the timing parameters are well-approximated using minimum setup and clock-to- $Q$ values.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.