Abstract
Anti-competitive mergers may be held up when outside firms respond pro-competitively. I examine the profitability of cross-border mergers by embedding a class of oligopoly models—where mergers are anti-competitive and actions are strategic substitutes—in a sequential merger game, cast in a two-country setting. I find that cross-border mergers: (i) are held up only when ‘international differences’ are minimal; (ii) happen in clusters, not in isolation; and (iii) can be interdependent. I illustrate with two standard oligopolies. The ‘bumpiness’ of the world suggests that the hold-up problem is less pervasive in an open-economy context.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.