Abstract

This study presents an empirical collection of Biblical Hebrew verbal forms, arguing that at one stage of the Hebrew language syntax was based on a combination of sequences and taxis (the chronological relations between two “actions”). The suffix conjugation and the prefix conjugation had different functions in a past/anterior sequence and in a non-past/non-anterior sequence. In a past/anterior sequence, the suffix conjugation denoted a co-ordinate element, while the prefix conjugation denoted a sub-ordinate element. In a non-past/non-anterior sequence, on the other hand, the prefix conjugation denoted a co-ordinate element, whereas the suffix conjugation denoted a sub-ordinate element. This syntax was identical in direct speech, subordinate clauses, narration and poetry.

Highlights

  • Verbal syntax is undoubtedly a major issue in the study of the grammar of Biblical Hebrew (BH)

  • I combine the concept of taxis with that of sequences and examine sequences involving Suffix Conjugation (SC) and Prefix Conjugation (PC) in prose and poetry, but I do not follow the sequential approach in several respects: (1) I do not assign to the introductory verb the role of determining the function of the following verbal forms

  • I have trodden the wine press alone, and from the peoples no one was with me; I trod them in my anger and trampled them in my wrath; their juice spattered on my garments, and stained all my robes (NRSV)

Read more

Summary

A VEXED QUESTION

Verbal syntax is undoubtedly a major issue in the study of the grammar of Biblical Hebrew (BH). This aspect of BH has long been considered an enigma and, as a result, many potential explanations have been proposed. New and more sophisticated theories based on modern linguistic models have been elaborated (for detailed presentations, see McFall 1982; Cook 2012: 77–175, 273–75). After briefly presenting the most important approaches to this issue (§ 1.2), I will put forward my own theory (§ 2). I will present supporting data, first regarding past/anterior sequences (§ 3) and for non-past/non-anterior sequences

DIFFERENT APPROACH ES
A NEW APPROACH
T H E N EED FOR A N EW APPROACH
AN E MPIRICAL DATA C OLLECTION
ONLY ONE P H ASE
SUFFIX C ONJUGATION AND P REFIX C ONJUGATION
T H E SEQUENCES
T WO KINDS OF SEQUENCES
T AXIS
SEQUENCES AND T AXIS
C O-ORDINATION AND SUB -ORDINATION
2.10. T H E M EANINGS OF SC AND PC
SC as the First Verb in Main Sentence in Direct
Sam 2:30
SC as First Verb in a Secondary Clause
SC as the First Verb in a Main Sentence in Narration
OTH ER C ONSTRUCTIONS IN T H E F IRST P LACE
SC AFTER ANOTH ER SC
Sam 30:14
Kgs 3:11
Kgs 15:1–2
Kgs 3:3
PC IN TH E SECOND P OSITION
Sam 15:24
C OMING B ACK TO SC
Kgs 12:29
Kgs 11:11–12
Sam 8:11–17
SC IN THE SECOND P OSITION
Kgs 1:35
T H E I MPERATIVE
P H ASAL ASPECTS
Habitual and Iterative in the Past and Non-Past
Durative in the Past and Non-Past
T H E DOUBLING OF SEQUENCES
T H E SAME SYNTAX IN E VERY C ONTEXT
OTH ER KINDS OF ANALYSIS
T OWARD A DIACH RONIC ANALYSIS
Kgs 20:12
E QUIVALENT ?
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.