Abstract

Trypanosoma and Plasmodium species are unicellular, eukaryotic pathogens that have evolved the capacity to survive and proliferate within a human host, causing sleeping sickness and malaria, respectively. They have very different survival strategies. African trypanosomes divide in blood and extracellular spaces, whereas Plasmodium species invade and proliferate within host cells. Interaction with host macromolecules is central to establishment and maintenance of an infection by both parasites. Proteins that mediate these interactions are under selection pressure to bind host ligands without compromising immune avoidance strategies. In both parasites, the expansion of genes encoding a small number of protein folds has established large protein families. This has permitted both diversification to form novel ligand binding sites and variation in sequence that contributes to avoidance of immune recognition. In this review we consider two such parasite surface protein families, one from each species. In each case, known structures demonstrate how extensive sequence variation around a conserved molecular architecture provides an adaptable protein scaffold that the parasites can mobilise to mediate interactions with their hosts.

Highlights

  • Surface proteins lie at the heart of the interactions between parasites and their hosts

  • Surface proteins lie at the heart of the conflict between parasite and host

  • Their exposure to the host adaptive immune system provides a pressure towards antigenic variation to avoid immunoglobulin binding

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Surface proteins lie at the heart of the interactions between parasites and their hosts. While Plasmodium and African trypanosome species have very different life cycles, their surface proteins have many similar requirements Both parasites operate in the context of the adaptive immune system, and the VSGs and PfEMP1s have diversified into large and complex families, allowing parasites to switch expression through antigenic variation to avoid immune detection. Members of both families must interact with unvarying host receptors and nutrient molecules, leading to a requirement for conserved binding faces. Structure-based alignment of ten A type VSGs based on these two structures revealed only

Higgins and Carrington
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.