Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for Ets-1 ETS domain–DNA complexes were performed to investigate the mechanism of sequence-specific recognition of the GGAA DNA core by the ETS domain. Employing the crystal structure of the Ets-1 ETS domain–DNA complex as a starting structure we carried out MD simulations of: (i) the complex between Ets-1 ETS domain and a 14 base-pair DNA containing GGAA core sequence (ETS–GGAA); (ii) the complex between the ETS domain and a DNA having single base-pair mutation, GGAG sequence (ETS–GGAG); and (iii) the 14 base-pair DNA alone (GGAA). Comparative analyses of the MD structures of ETS–GGAA and ETS–GGAG reveal that the DNA bending angles and the ETS domain–DNA phosphate interactions are similar in these complexes. These results support that the GGAA core sequence is distinguished from the mutated GGAG sequence by a direct readout mechanism in the Ets-1 ETS domain–DNA complex. Further analyses of the direct contacts in the interface between the helix-3 region of Ets-1 and the major groove of the core DNA sequence clearly show that the highly conserved arginine residues, Arg391 and Arg394, play a critical role in binding to the GGAA core sequence. These arginine residues make bidentate contacts with the nucleobases of GG dinucleotides in GGAA core sequence. In ETS–GGAA, the hydroxyl group of Tyr395 is hydrogen bonded to N7 nitrogen of A 3 (the third adenosine in the GGAA core), while the hydroxyl group makes a contact with N4 nitrogen of C 4′ (the complementary nucleotide of the fourth guanosine G 4 in the GGAG sequence) in the ETS–GGAG complex. We have found that this difference in behavior of Tyr395 results in the relatively large motion of helix-3 in the ETS–GGAG complex, causing the collapse of bidentate contacts between Arg391/Arg394 and the GG dinucleotides in the GGAG sequence.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have