Septoplasty and Nasal Packs From Otolaryngologists' Perspectives: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Abstract

Introduction Septoplasty is a commonly performed surgery by otolaryngologists. This study examines the routine use of non-absorbable nasal packs in the postoperative period in Kuwait. Our aim is to assess the views of otolaryngologists in Kuwait regarding the routine use of non-absorbable nasal packing after septoplasty with or without turbinoplasty. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study, an anonymous survey, consisting of 10 questions, using Google Forms was conducted. It was distributed via WhatsApp and in person hard copies to otolaryngologists - head and neck surgeons in Kuwait. Data were securely stored and analyzed using Stata (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas) software. Results Fifty participants have completed the survey. The majority were routinely performing septoplasty for a symptomatic deviated nasal septum (n= 47, 94%). Out of those, 43% (n = 21) usually use silastic splints to prevent postoperative complications, including bleeding, hematoma formation, and adhesions. The use of quilting sutures for the same purpose was done by 21% (n = 10), and 17% (n = 8) used non-absorbable nasal packs. Only two participants believed that no specific intervention was required. More than half used postoperative nasal packs in the case of intra-operative bleeding (n=26, 52%), while 18% (n = 9) believed that it is only necessary in selected cases with predisposing factors to bleeding. Ninety-two percent (n = 46) thought that pain and discomfort were associated with the use of non-absorbable nasal packs, and 50% (n = 25) believed that it could cause hemodynamic instability. Moreover, 66% (n = 33) agreed that quilting or trans-septal sutures can safely substitute nasal packs following septoplasty. Awareness of recent updates on the complications related to nasal packing varied, with more than half of the otolaryngologists being knowledgeable (n = 29, 58%). Discussion Septoplasty, a common surgical intervention for correcting a misaligned nasal septum, addresses various symptoms, such as nasal obstruction, obstructive sleep apnea, epistaxis, and headache. While the practice of nasal packing for 24-48 hours post-septoplasty is widespread, it remains a topic of controversy. Current literature supports the continued use of nasal packing for patients at high risk of bleeding. However, potential drawbacks, including increased pain, headache, and prolonged hospital stay, raise concerns about its overall benefits. An alternative approach, utilizing quilting sutures without nasal packs, has shown promising results in comparative studies, demonstrating less pain and minimal bleeding. Additionally, trans-septal sutures emerge as a safe alternative, minimizing dead space and reducing post-operative complications. Conclusion It appears that otolaryngologists in Kuwait have diverse opinions with regard to nasal packing following septoplasty. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for this common procedure.