Septal Leaflet Versus Chordal Detachment in Closure of Hard-to-Expose Ventricular Septal Defects

Abstract

Different techniques have been used for exposure of ventricular septal defect (VSD) margins when there is crowding of the VSD anatomy by tricuspid valve subvalvar apparatus. This study compared surgical outcomes for the two techniques of tricuspid valve leaflet detachment and the rarely described tricuspid valve chordal detachment for hard-to-expose VSDs. Patients undergoing transatrial VSD repair were identified from our institutional database. Follow-up echocardiography and patient data were obtained from medical records. Between January 2005 and August 2016, 130 isolated conoventricular VSDs were repaired. Among these, 26 patients underwent leaflet detachment, 15 underwent chordal detachment, and 89 underwent regular VSD repair (reference group). The groups did not differ significantly in age, weight, postoperative length of stay, genetic/syndromic abnormalities, time to extubation, and left and right ventricular systolic function. The cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time were significantly longer in the leaflet detachment group than in the reference group (118 ± 28 vs 102 ± 32 minutes [p= 0.02] and 73 ± 20 vs 61 ± 23 minutes [p= 0.01], respectively). Echocardiographic follow-up was available for 87 patients at a mean of 2.6 years (range, 1 month to 11 years). Tricuspid regurgitation was rated as none or trivial in 66 (76%), mild in 20 (23%), and moderate in 1 reference group patient. There was no difference in presence of residual VSD or degree of tricuspid regurgitation among the three groups. There was no reoperation for tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid valve leaflet and chordal detachment techniques provide an equally viable and safe alternative to closure of hard-to-expose VSDs while maintaining appropriate tricuspid valve function. Their use in our series did not lead to increased tricuspid valve dysfunction at early-to-midterm echocardiographic assessment.