Abstract
In a laboratory experiment, the following methods of separating the soil CO2 flux into the root respiration and the respiration of the rhizosphere and nonrhizosphere microorganisms were compared: (1) root exclusion, (2) component integration, and (3) 14C pulse labeling. Depending on the method used, the combined contribution of the rhizosphere microorganisms and roots varied from 18 to 40% of the total CO2 emission; the contribution of the roots alone was 8–19%, and that of the nonrhizosphere microorganisms was 51–82%. The nonisotope methods (1 and 2) gave similar results of the separation. The pulse labeling of plants satisfactorily separated the root and microbial respiration, but it is unsuitable for determining the respiration of the nonrhizosphere microorganisms. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
