Abstract

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 creates a system in which there is a separation of the powers exercised by the different branches of the State. It also creates a system of checks and balances. The exercise of a power by one arm of state is checked by another to ensure that there is no abuse of state power. Organs of state ought to respect each other and the powers allocated to them by the Constitution. To this end, no organ of state should encroach upon the domain of the other organs. However, the courts wield enormous power because they are the ultimate guardians and custodians of the Constitution in South Africa. Courts have the power to declare any law or conduct unconstitutional. Where decisions have been taken by other arms of the State on matters falling within their exclusive domain and such decisions violate the Constitution, courts have a duty to intervene in order to make organs of state act within constitutional bounds. However, courts should not be overzealous and should not encroach upon the powers of the other arms of the State when exercising their judicial power and authority. Against this backdrop, this article analyses how the South African courts have cautioned themselves to exercise self-restraint in order not to usurp or encroach upon the powers of the other arms of the State while exercising their judicial authority and power.

Highlights

  • The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 provides for the implementation of the doctrine of separation of powers

  • The constitutional framework is to the effect that the legislative authority of the Republic, in the national sphere of government, is vested in Parliament; in the provincial sphere of government, it is vested in the provincial legislature; and in the local sphere of government, it is vested in the municipal council.[2]

  • The executive authority of the Republic, in the national sphere of government, is vested in the President;[3] in the provincial sphere, the executive authority is vested in the premier of the province;[4] and in the local sphere of government, it is vested in the municipal council.[5]

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 creates a system in which there is a separation of the powers exercised by the different branches of the State. It creates a system of checks and balances. To this end, no organ of state should encroach upon the domain of the other organs. Courts should not be overzealous and should not encroach upon the powers of the other arms of the State when exercising their judicial power and authority. This article analyses how the South African courts have cautioned themselves to exercise self-restraint in order not to usurp or encroach upon the powers of the other arms of the State while exercising their judicial authority and power

INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTING CHECKS AND BALANCES
ARMS OF THE STATE ARE INTERRELATED
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.