Abstract

We solve some fundamental problems in the number-on-forehead (NOF) $k$-player communication model. We show that there exists a function which has at most logarithmic communication complexity for randomized protocols with one-sided false-positives error probability of 1/3, but which has linear communication complexity for deterministic protocols, and in fact, even for the more powerful nondeterministic protocols. The result holds for every $\epsilon > 0$ and every $k \le 2^{(1-\epsilon)n}$ players, where $n$ is the number of bits on each player's forehead. As a consequence, we obtain the NOF communication class separation $\mathsf{coRP} \not\subset \mathsf{NP}$. This in particular implies that $\mathsf{P} \neq \mathsf{RP}$ and $\mathsf{NP} \neq \mathsf{coNP}$. We also show that for every $\epsilon > 0$ and every $k \le n^{1-\epsilon}$, there exists a function which has constant randomized complexity for public coin protocols but at least logarithmic complexity for private coin protocols. No larger gap between private and public coin protocols is possible. Our lower bounds are existential; no explicit function is known to satisfy nontrivial lower bounds for $k \ge \log n$ players. However, for every $\epsilon > 0$ and every $k \le (1-\epsilon) \cdot \log n$ players, the $\mathsf{NP} \ne \mathsf{coNP}$ separation (and even the $\mathsf{coNP} \not\subset \mathsf{MA}$ separation) was obtained independently by Gavinsky and Sherstov (2010) using an explicit construction. In this work, for $k \le (1/9) \cdot \log n$ players, we exhibit an explicit function which has communication complexity $O(1)$ for public coin protocols and $\Omega(\log n)$ for deterministic protocols. This improves the best previously known deterministic lower bound for a function with efficient randomized protocols, which was $\Omega(\log \log n)$, given by Beigel, Gasarch, and Glenn (2006). It follows from our existential result that any function that is complete for the class of functions with polylogarithmic nondeterministic $k$-player communication complexity does not have polylogarithmic deterministic complexity. We show that the set intersection function, which is complete in the number-in-hand model, is not complete in the NOF model under cylindrical reductions.

Highlights

  • The question of how much communication is necessary in order to compute a function when its input is distributed between several computationally unbounded players was introduced by Yao [26], and it has since been shown to have many applications in diverse areas of computer science

  • Subsequent to the preliminary version of this paper [5], in a series of works by Lee and Shraibman [19], Chattopadhyay and Ada [13], and Beame and Huynh [7], lower bounds were obtained for the randomized complexity of the set disjointness function for k ≤ O1/3 players, implying the NOF communication complexity class separation NPckc ⊂ BPPckc, and RPckc = NPckc

  • In this paper we give a nonconstructive separation of the NOF communication complexity classes Pckc and RPckc for up to k ≤ nO(1) players

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The question of how much communication is necessary in order to compute a function when its input is distributed between several computationally unbounded players was introduced by Yao [26], and it has since been shown to have many applications in diverse areas of computer science. The problem of separating deterministic from nondeterministic NOF communication complexity is interesting because of its connection to proof complexity It was shown by Beame, Pitassi, and Segerlind [8] that for k = 3, (log n)Ω(1) lower bounds on the randomized NOF complexity of set intersection, which has nondeterministic NOF complexity O (log n), would imply lower bounds for polynomial threshold proof systems, such as the Lovasz-Schrijver proof systems, as well as the Chvatal cutting planes proof system. Subsequent to the preliminary version of this paper [5], in a series of works by Lee and Shraibman [19], Chattopadhyay and Ada [13], and Beame and Huynh [7], lower bounds were obtained for the randomized complexity of the set disjointness function for k ≤ O (log n)1/3 players, implying the NOF communication complexity class separation NPckc ⊂ BPPckc, and RPckc = NPckc. Their results are based on an explicit construction, and they hold for every ε > 0 and every k < (1 − ε) log n players

Definitions and preliminaries
Non-constructive separations
Separating randomized and deterministic protocols
Separating public-coin and private-coin protocols
Lower bounds for explicit graph functions
Representing graph functions by colorings and cylinder intersections
A function family for 3 players
A function family for 3 or more players
On complete problems
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call