Abstract
Oil project assessment using separate cashflow valuation (Jacoby and Laughton, 1992, Laughton and Jacoby, 1993 and Emhjellen, 1999), presume that the present value of the cost cashflow of oil projects can be calculated using a risk free rate. This paper examines whether this practice, at least to a first approximation, is reasonable. More specifically, the paper examines whether labour wage hours costs and steel prices, as cost factors in the investment cost stream, are systematic cost factors (i.e. have a beta different from zero). The paper also investigates whether oil price as a factor in the revenue stream is a systematic revenue factor. Separate cash flow evaluation has been discussed in relation to petroleum taxation. A petroleum tax commission in Norway stated that tax reductions due to depreciation should separately be discounted by a risk free rate. We discuss the role of partial cash flow discounting in tax design.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
