Abstract
The effects of the order of presentation of motive and consequence information on the moral judgments of kindergarten,, second-, and fifth-grade children were examined. Information type (motives vs. consequences) was varied factorially with presentation position (first vs. second) allowing application of recent models of source credibility. Recency effects were obtained at all three ages. Since subjects were required to repeat each story prior to judgment, verbatim memory is unlikely to be the sole cause of recency. The results also showed a developmental shift in the weights of motives and consequences. For fifth graders, evidence suggested that the weight of motives was larger than the weight of consequences, whereas for kindergartners the weight of consequences was larger than the weight of motives. These conclusions do not depend on the assumption that the scale values are developmental^ static, a necessary assumption in previous research. Following Piaget's (1965) suggestion of a developmental progression from use of consequences toward the use of motives in making moral judgments, work on children's evaluations of the deeds of others first focused on finding the age at which children are capable of considering the motives of
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.