Abstract

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate the separability of the neural correlates of 2 types of motor imagery, self and third person (actions owned by the participant himself vs. another individual). If possible this would allow for the development of BCI interfaces to train disorders of action and intention understanding beyond simple imitation, such as autism.MethodsWe used EEG recordings from 20 healthy participants, as well as electrocorticography (ECoG) in one, based on a virtual reality setup. To test feasibility of discrimination between each type of imagery at the single trial level, time-frequency and source analysis were performed and further assessed by data-driven statistical classification using Support Vector Machines.ResultsThe main observed differences between self-other imagery conditions in topographic maps were found in Frontal and Parieto-Occipital regions, in agreement with the presence of 2 independent non μ related contributions in the low alpha frequency range. ECOG corroborated such separability. Source analysis also showed differences near the temporo-parietal junction and single-trial average classification accuracy between both types of motor imagery was 67 ± 1%, and raised above 70% when 3 trials were used. The single-trial classification accuracy was significantly above chance level for all the participants of this study (p < 0.02).ConclusionsThe observed pattern of results show that Self and Third Person MI use distinct electrophysiological mechanisms detectable at the scalp (and ECOG) at the single trial level, with separable levels of involvement of the mirror neuron system in different regions.These observations provide a promising step to develop new BCI training/rehabilitation paradigms for patients with neurodevelopmental disorders of action understanding beyond simple imitation, such as autism, who would benefit from training and anticipation of the perceived intention of others as opposed to own intentions in social contexts.

Highlights

  • We aimed to investigate the separability of the neural correlates of 2 types of motor imagery, self and third person

  • The strong overlap between Motor imagery (MI) and motor performance (MP) brain processes may be used to help in rehabilitation therapies for movement recovery in stroke patients using imagery targeted at movements that need to be rehabilitated [11, 12]

  • Our results suggest that networks subserving each type of movement representation are separable at the single trial and individual scalp level, involving distinct parts of the action and intention understanding circuitry related to the mirror-neuron system (MNS) and beyond this system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We aimed to investigate the separability of the neural correlates of 2 types of motor imagery, self and third person (actions owned by the participant himself vs. another individual). If possible this would allow for the development of BCI interfaces to train disorders of action and intention understanding beyond simple imitation, such as autism. Motor imagery (MI) is defined as a dynamic state during which a subject simulates an action mentally irrespective of body movement [1] This mental simulation can be subdivided into third person and self imagery [2]. The strong overlap between MI and MP brain processes may be used to help in rehabilitation therapies for movement recovery in stroke patients using imagery targeted at movements that need to be rehabilitated [11, 12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call