Abstract
This paper examines the effect of victim impact evidence in capital‐murder jury trials in California since the United States Supreme Court decided Payne v. Tennessee in 1991. Pursuant to Payne, prosecutors can use victim impact evidence in capital‐murder cases to encourage sentencing juries to impose death as an alternative punishment to life in prison without the possibility of parole. We analyzed 151 capital cases occurring in thirty‐six counties in California between 1989 and 1994. Our findings show that the presentation of victim impact evidence increases the likelihood of receiving a death sentence for some crimes. Secondly, our findings show that victim impact evidence has greater consequences for cases involving Latino defendants, and in cases involving nonwhite defendants and victims.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
