Abstract
How sentences from a discourse are recognized or verified can be explained by combining theories of item recognition derived from list-learning experiments with hypotheses about the representation of text in memory within the framework of the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. The implications of such a theory of sentence recognition are worked out for two experimental situations. In the first experiment, subjects read brief texts and were then tested for recognition with verbatim old sentences, paraphrases, inferences, and contextually related and unrelated new distractor sentences after delays from 0 to 4 days. Differential decay rates for the wording and meaning of the text and for situational information were observed. The theory provides a good quantitative account of the data. In the second experiment, the speed-accuracy trade-off in sentence verification for two subject groups with different prior knowledge was studied for old verbatim sentences and inferences. Qualitative predictions derived from the theory with the parameter estimates from the first study were in agreement with the data. Readers without an adequate situational understanding (novices) were found to make quick judgments based on surface and textbase characteristics of the test sentences, while experts in addition utilized their situation model successfully, which required more processing time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
