Abstract

The proposed Federal Criminal Code features several tnnovations aimed at the problem of disparate sentencrng. In keepitg with the Journal of Crmzinal Law and Crimntology's singular interdisczthlnary tradition, we present below two viewpotnts rarely encountered together. The first it a criminological evaluation of sentencing disparit'es based on empirical studies by a research group. In the second, Judge Tj7o;at provides a legal analysis of the same issue, drawing on his practical experience on the federal bench. They complement and supplement one another. THE EDITORS

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.