Sensory neuronopathies: A case series and literature review.

Abstract

Journal of the Peripheral Nervous SystemVolume 26, Issue 2 p. 238-238 ERRATUMFree Access Sensory neuronopathies: A case series and literature review This article corrects the following: Sensory neuronopathies: A case series and literature review Agustin Sancho Saldaña, Mohamed Mahdi-Rogers, Robert David Hadden, Volume 26Issue 1Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System pages: 66-74 First Published online: January 31, 2021 First published: 20 June 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/jns.12442AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat In Sancho Saldaña et al.,1 the following errors were published. The corrected text is provided below: In the Abstract, “They retrospectively included 54 patients …” should read “We retrospectively included…”. “About 54 patients were included…” should read “Fifty-four patients were included…”. Also in the Abstract, “About 31 patients received immune therapy…” should read “Thirty-one patients received immune therapy…”. In the first paragraph of Section 3.1, the second sentence, “About 36 (67%) were female and 18 (33%) male” should read “Thirty-six (67%) were female and 18 (33%) male.” In the first paragraph of Section 3.1, the fifth sentence, “About 10 patients (18%) had a malignancy…” should read “Ten patients (18%) had a malignancy…”. In the first paragraph of Section 3.1, the last sentence, “About 27 patients (50%) had a chronic onset (Table 1)” should read “Twenty-seven patients (50%) had a chronic onset (Table 1).” In the second paragraph of Section 3.1, the 12th sentence, “About 18 patients were classified as possibly inflammatory…” should read “Eighteen patients were classified as possibly inflammatory…”. In the first paragraph of Section 3.3, the third sentence, “About 7 (25%) nerve biopsies had mild non-specific inflammatory cells…” should read “Seven (25%) nerve biopsies had mild non-specific inflammatory cells…”. References 3, 13, 20, and 38 were published with incomplete bibliographic information. The corrected references follow: 3. Kuntzer T, Steck AJ. Sensory Neuronopathies or Ganglionopathies. In:Donofrio PD, eds. Textbook of Peripheral Neuropathy. New York: Demos Medical Publishing; 2012; 20:273-288. 13. Breiner A, Moher D, Brooks J, et al. Adult CSF total protein upper reference limits should be age-partitioned and significantly higher than 0.45 g/L: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2019;266(3):616-624. 20. Sharp FR, Rando TA, Geenberg SA, Brown L, Sagar SM. Pseudochoreoathetosis Movements Associated With Loss of Proprioception. Arch Neurol. 1994; 51:1103-1109. 38. Hadjivassiliou M, Rao DG, Sanders DS, Gru RA, Grünewald RA, Davies-Jones AGB. Sensory ganglionopathy due to gluten sensitivity. Neurology. 2010;75(11):1003-1008. We apologize for these errors. REFERENCE 1Sancho Saldaña A, Mahdi-Rogers M, Hadden RD. Sensory neuronopathies: A case series and literature review. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2021; 26: 66- 74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jns.12433. Wiley Online LibraryPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Volume26, Issue2June 2021Pages 238-238 ReferencesRelatedInformation