Abstract

ABSTRACTThe terms “fresh” and “frozen” often refer to the physical state of the product (i.e., soft, hard) as well as quality state (i.e., good, inferior). This study addressed quality issues of breast meat subjected to chill‐store regimes that simulate possible scenarios at points between processing, distribution by retailers, and final preparation by consumers. Five temperatures (+4,0, −3, −12, and −18C) at storage regimes (2 days, 7 days, and 7 days at the five temperatures followed by an additional 7 days at −18C) were evaluated. The statistical differences in descriptive sensory texture and moisture characteristics among cooked samples could not be predominantly attributed to temperature, storage, or temperature‐storage treatments. Visible and near‐infrared reflectance spectra of stored raw skinless breasts did not discriminate between individual temperature groups. However, a two‐class model (98.5% correct classification) discriminated between unfrozen (+4, 0, and −3C) and frozen (−12 and −18C) samples, partially due to spectra of myoglobin and oxidative states.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.