Abstract

Aim: The evolution of consumer expectations has led to the development of new production methods using low inputs. From an oenological point of view, these methods include the production of wines without any SO2 being added throughout the process. These wines are becoming very popular among consumers, but the absence of SO2 during winemaking increases the risk of stability problems. Such wines have been poorly explored in the literature and there is thus a real need for them to be characterised. This study was developed to evaluate whether Bordeaux quality wines produced without added SO2 have their own typicality, and it provides an insight into current wine production.Methods and results: From a batch of fifty-two commercial Bordeaux red wines produced without adding SO2 and twenty red wines made according to the usual winemaking methods, a selection tasting was performed to eliminate wines with at least one defect further to a sensory space evaluation. In a second phase, the Napping test was applied to defect-free wines to evaluate the sensory specificities of wines produced without SO2 addition. The wines without SO2 addition presented a much higher frequency of defects than those with SO2 (70 % vs 15 % respectively). Defects described in wines without added SO2 were: “Oxidation” (47 %), “Volatile phenols” (31 %), “Mousy off-flavor” (10 %), “Reduction” (8 %) and “Vegetable” (4 %). Since the study focused on quality wines with or without SO2 addition, it was difficult for the tasters to discriminate between them according to their overall technical pathway.Conclusion: This approach has revealed that despite the large number of “non-added SO2” wines with defects, upon blind tasting, expert tasters highlighted some “non-added SO2” wines without defects. Nevertheless, at equivalent quality levels within the same geographic region, and in non-targeted sensory tests, wines with and without SO2 addition were considered to be quite similar.Significance of the study: This study was a first sensory step toward the objective characterisation of “non-added SO2” wines, enabling further work to highlight markers of quality in wines without SO2 addition and to develop the production of “non-added SO2” wines without defects. Nevertheless, at this stage, our results show that the absence of sulfites during the whole winemaking process, including bottling, increases the risk of the development of defects.

Highlights

  • Since the development of the “Dutch match” in the 18th century, sulfur dioxide (SO2) has been widely used in the wine industry (RibéreauGayon et al, 2017), in the literature the first report of SO2 being used for food preservation dates back to 1664, when sulfur was burned in cider containers (Roberts and McWeeny, 1972)

  • With a focus on evaluating the typicality of quality wines produced without added sulfites, this study started by selecting the wines with which it was possible to continue

  • 20 mg/L is considered by some winemakers to be a low value for total SO2 produced during alcoholic fermentation performed with indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the development of the “Dutch match” in the 18th century, sulfur dioxide (SO2) has been widely used in the wine industry (RibéreauGayon et al, 2017), in the literature the first report of SO2 being used for food preservation dates back to 1664, when sulfur was burned in cider containers (Roberts and McWeeny, 1972). SO2 is generally added throughout the winemaking process for its various properties This additive is an anti-oxidant (Danilewicz, 2011; UsseglioTomasset, 1992) used in the food industry (Mareschi et al, 1992), and has specific properties acting against the tyrosinase and laccase from Botrytis cinerea (Dubernet and Ribéreau-Gayon, 1973), the two oxidases that may be present in grapes. It combines various antimicrobial properties affecting, among others, yeasts as well as lactic acid bacteria (Carr et al, 1976; Solberg, 1991; Zuehlke and Edwards, 2013). Sulfur dioxide levels in wines are mostly of exogenous origin

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call