Abstract

Non-destructive measurement of fruit firmness is a difficult problem and many different sensors have been developed in order to achieve this task. Three different European laboratories were associated in collaborative experiments on peaches, to compare three different sensing techniques, namely, sound, impact and micro-deformation. A Bayesian classifier is associated with each individual sensor and provides a classification into three categories, namely “soft”, “half firm” and “firm”. The fusion of the different sensors is performed by using Bayesian classifiers associated with heuristic methods for identity fusion. The result of the identity fusion is compared with the classification provided by an unsupervised algorithm based on destructive measurements. The fusion process provides some improvement in the classification results. For the individual sensors, the error rate of the classification varied from 19 to 28%, but the fusion process reduced this to 14%. Moreover, all measures of agreement between sensors lead to the conclusion that fusing sensors is better than using individual sensors

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.