Abstract

Sensor data quality plays a vital role in Internet of Things (IoT) applications as they are rendered useless if the data quality is bad. This systematic review aims to provide an introduction and guide for researchers who are interested in quality-related issues of physical sensor data. The process and results of the systematic review are presented which aims to answer the following research questions: what are the different types of physical sensor data errors, how to quantify or detect those errors, how to correct them and what domains are the solutions in. Out of 6970 literatures obtained from three databases (ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore and ScienceDirect) using the search string refined via topic modelling, 57 publications were selected and examined. Results show that the different types of sensor data errors addressed by those papers are mostly missing data and faults e.g. outliers, bias and drift. The most common solutions for error detection are based on principal component analysis (PCA) and artificial neural network (ANN) which accounts for about 40% of all error detection papers found in the study. Similarly, for fault correction, PCA and ANN are among the most common, along with Bayesian Networks. Missing values on the other hand, are mostly imputed using Association Rule Mining. Other techniques include hybrid solutions that combine several data science methods to detect and correct the errors. Through this systematic review, it is found that the methods proposed to solve physical sensor data errors cannot be directly compared due to the non-uniform evaluation process and the high use of non-publicly available datasets. Bayesian data analysis done on the 57 selected publications also suggests that publications using publicly available datasets for method evaluation have higher citation rates.

Highlights

  • With the emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless sensor networks (WSNs), sensor devices are deployed across the globe in a variety of fields such as healthcare, industry, agriculture, home, and transport [1]

  • This is slightly different from the data quality (DQ) dimensions introduced by Wang and Strong [4], which categorize the quality of data in databases or high-level application architecture (Application Layer in Fig. 1) that are important to data consumers

  • Apart from incomplete and inaccurate data, which are sensor data quality-related issues, other DQ dimensions such as inconsistent data and timeliness are not considered in this review paper as they are more specific to the topics of database design or communication data quality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless sensor networks (WSNs), sensor devices are deployed across the globe in a variety of fields such as healthcare, industry, agriculture, home, and transport [1]. This is slightly different from the data quality (DQ) dimensions introduced by Wang and Strong [4], which categorize the quality of data in databases or high-level application architecture (Application Layer in Fig. 1) that are important to data consumers. They are mostly used to describe data in enterprise-level systems and are used for modelling how data errors propagate to the consumer’s end. A survey related to DQ dimensions is presented in the works of Karkouch et al [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call